Acute Heavy Menstrual Bleeding!

September 5, 2025

Question:

I am used to treating patients who report chronic heavy menstrual bleeding, but what can I do for a patient in my clinic who at this moment is actively losing excessive amounts of blood? She has to change her pad every 30-40 minutes and wear double protection to prevent spillage. I can tell she needs help now and may not be able to be referred.

Answer:

Acute heavy menstrual bleeding is most often seen in Emergency Room settings. Sometimes women actually delay their clinic visits because of acute bleeding. The pain and challenges pose to traveling and maintaining personal hygiene. Regardless of where you see her – In your office, in an urgent care setting, even in an ER, the initial work-up is the same, advises Anita Nelson, MD.

  • Determine that she is hemodynamically stable. Check her symptoms and vital signs (are there any orthostatic changes?).
  • Rule out pregnancy with a urine pregnancy test.
  • Measure a hemoglobin/hematocrit to rule out anemia. A HBG > 8 mg/L is needed for outpatient management.
  • Ask about medication she may be taking, particularly anticoagulants.
  • Obtain a complete menstrual history, including past episodes, past work-ups and past treatments and their effectiveness. Any prior cancers.
  • Perform a targeted exam starting with an abdominal exam to rule out enlarged, irregularly shaped uterus.
  • Pelvic exam would follow. In particular, rule out more unusual causes of acute bleeding, like aborting fibroid, trauma, known carcinoma, foreign body.

Having ruled out conditions that may require immediate procedures, the good news is that most episodes of acute excessive bleeding will respond very well to hormonal therapies. As you select the best to use, it helps to remember that the treatment must not only be able to safely stop the immediate bleeding, but also to prevent any more bleeding for 4 weeks. This time is needed for the patient to rebuild her hemoglobin and for the provider to obtain the results of any tests that were performed to help diagnose the cause of the abnormal bleeding so more targeted long-term plans can be designed.

The most effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment that achieves these goals relies on high-dose progestin. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 20 mg by mouth 3 times a day for 7 days, followed by MPA 20 mg orally once a day for 3 more months. This progestin-only treatment stops bleeding rapidly and effectively and usually induces amenorrhea for at least 28 days. This regimen does not contain any estrogen. Also, MPA is not metabolized into estrogen the way other progestins (e.g., norethindrone acetate) are. This means that the estrogen-induced risk of thromboembolism is minimized. Studies show that this high-dose treatment is also well-tolerated. Protocols that call for shorter-term or lower-dose progestin are more frequently offered, but they are not supported by evidence, and they often fail to achieve both treatment goals. Most commonly, MPA 10 mg by mouth daily for 10 days is recommended, but it often causes repeat bleeding within 3 days of cessation.

In some settings, estrogen-containing oral contraceptives are used. If these are used, it is important to avoid excessively high doses and rapid “tapering” that result in rebleeding shortly after the treatment ends.

Any pill with 1 mg norethindrone and 35 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) can be used in either of these regimens.

  • 1/35 pill with norethindrone and EE given orally, 3 times a day for 7 days, followed by a 1/20 norethindrone and EE pill once a day for the next 21 days.

OR

  • 1/35 pill with norethindrone and EE given orally every 12 hours for 2 doses, followed by 1 pill daily for the rest of the pill packet.

There is no need to use higher doses of oral contraceptives initially, as it increases VTE risk. Similarly, more rapid “tapering” can induce repeat abnormal bleeding. The first option was tested and published against the MPA-only protocol. The single day, higher dose with normal dose for the subsequent 26 days was recommended in recent textbooks.

It should be noted that these treatments have only been tested in hemodynamically stable women who are eligible for outpatient care. The data supporting medical hormonal treatment for those whose bleeding requires hospitalization is less well supported. Both combined oral contraceptives and intravenous estrogen alone or consecutively have been recommended. More research is clearly needed for these women.

Other Latebreakers

Sep. 05, 2025

Acute Heavy Menstrual Bleeding!

Aug. 01, 2025

New and Updated Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening

Jun. 20, 2025

The Patient Asks—I’m on Depo-Provera, What’s My Risk for Meningioma?

May. 01, 2025

Clinical Tools for Contraceptive Eligibility and Practice

Jan. 13, 2025

New ovarian cyst despite CHC use by patient with PCOs?

Nov. 14, 2024

Mood Swings, Depression, and CHCs

Oct. 15, 2024

Higher Body Weight Effect on Combined Hormonal Contraceptives

Sep. 09, 2024

Perimenopause: pregnancy risks

Aug. 13, 2024

NEW! 2024 MEC & SPR (Free from the CDC)

Jul. 19, 2024

Medication Interactions and Contraceptive Effectiveness

Jun. 05, 2024

“Birth control has a TikTok problem.”

May. 08, 2024

Implant: Unpredictable Bleeding and Management

Mar. 19, 2024

Weight Changes and hormonal contraceptives

Feb. 16, 2024

What most affects contraceptive continuation?

Jan. 03, 2024

Resuming CT monthly updates! Introducing the new edition of Contraceptive Technology

Dec. 20, 2021

Substance use disorder: contraceptive options counseling

Oct. 15, 2021

What’s New in Contraception?

Sep. 21, 2021

Contraceptive Technology Conference!

Aug. 25, 2021

Biologic sexism of STIs

Jul. 16, 2021

Excess breast cancer deaths after COVID-19

Jul. 04, 2021

Contraception for patients with medical conditions

May. 18, 2021

Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Mar. 04, 2021

Treating vulvodynia

Feb. 11, 2021

Puzzling Over the Hurt Down-Under

Jan. 06, 2021

Serious Mental Illness and Contraception

Oct. 28, 2020

New 13-Cycle Vaginal Contraceptive System

Oct. 08, 2020

The Future of Family Planning in Post-COVID America

Sep. 09, 2020

New ASCCP Guidelines: Implications for FP

Aug. 02, 2020

On the alert: mood disorders during 2020 stressors

Jun. 25, 2020

Sex in the Time of COVID-19

May. 08, 2020

Challenges old and new during the pandemic

Mar. 31, 2020

Reproductive health in the time of Covid-19

Mar. 09, 2020

Talking about toys

Feb. 10, 2020

Missed Pills: The Problem That Hasn’t Gone Away

Jan. 02, 2020

Find the “yes! . . . and” rather than “no” or “but”

Nov. 01, 2019

Digital Family Planning: the Future is Now

Oct. 08, 2019

Irregular Bleeding Due to Contraceptives

Sep. 06, 2019

When she’s low on libido…

Aug. 06, 2019

Ouch! Best approaches to menstrual pain

Jun. 27, 2019

Contraceptive efficacy: understanding how user and method characteristics play their part

May. 29, 2019

Strategizing treatment for chronic heavy menstrual bleeding

May. 10, 2019

Perimenopause

Mar. 27, 2019

Untangling the literature on obesity and contraception

Feb. 26, 2019

High tech apps for no-tech FABM

Jan. 25, 2019

Menstrual exacerbation of other medical conditions

Jan. 04, 2019

From Princeton University: Thomas James Trussell (1949-2018)

Nov. 30, 2018

The Short and Long of IUD Use Duration

Oct. 30, 2018

Selecting a Method When Guidance Isn’t Clear-cut

Oct. 04, 2018

Healthcare in the Time of Digital Expansion

Aug. 30, 2018

Combined pills’ effect on mood disorders

Aug. 30, 2018

The Scoop on Two New FDA-Approved Contraceptive Methods

Aug. 01, 2018

Pregnancy of unknown location—meeting the challenge

Jul. 03, 2018

Big “yes” (with caveats) to CHCs during perimenopause

Apr. 02, 2018

Abortion in the U.S.: safe, declining, and under threat

Feb. 02, 2018

Hope for ovarian cancer screening test

Jan. 03, 2018

Breast cancer still a small risk with some hormonal contraceptives

Dec. 04, 2017

New treatment modality for BV

Nov. 07, 2017

Record rate of HPV-related throat cancer

Oct. 03, 2017

Viruses in semen potentially transmissible

Sep. 01, 2017

Don’t Abstain from Your Role in Abstinence

Jul. 26, 2017

Teens births declining but geographic ‘hotspots’ defy trend

Jun. 27, 2017

Online Medical Abortion Service Effective and Safe

May. 30, 2017

Do Women Really Need to Wait That Long?

May. 05, 2017

Reassuring news on depression and OC use

Apr. 06, 2017

PMDD: Genetic clues may lead to improved treatment

Mar. 02, 2017

Breast cancer risk when there is a family history

Feb. 03, 2017

Body weight link to breast and endometrial cancers (and 11 others)

Jan. 03, 2017

Family Planning in 2017 and Beyond

Dec. 01, 2016

Make Me Cry: Depression Link (Again)?

Nov. 02, 2016

Managing implant users’ bleeding and spotting

Oct. 13, 2016

Zika: Updated guidance for providers

Sep. 06, 2016

Pharmacist-prescribed contraceptives

Aug. 01, 2016

Hot off the press! 2016 MEC and SPR

Jul. 05, 2016

Zika virus fears prompt increased request for abortion in nations outlawing abortions

Jun. 13, 2016

Opioid use epidemic among reproductive-age women

May. 04, 2016

Good news on the family planning home front!

Apr. 04, 2016

War Against Planned Parenthood Hurts Women

Feb. 16, 2016

Win-win for both treatment and prevention

Feb. 08, 2016

Center of the Storm

Dec. 01, 2015

Ambivalence

Nov. 02, 2015

Menopause, mood, mental acuity, and hormone therapy

Oct. 01, 2015

Emergency contraception for teens

Sep. 03, 2015

Postpartum Contraception: Now, Not Later

Aug. 03, 2015

Reproductive tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, or sexually transmitted diseases: “a rose by any other name…”

Jun. 25, 2015

Are we practicing what we preach?

Jun. 02, 2015

Be alert to VTE in hormonal contraceptive users

May. 04, 2015

LARC among teens increased 15-fold, but not enough

Mar. 30, 2015

Brain cancer and hormonal contraception

Mar. 02, 2015

Free tools: Easy access to the US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use

Feb. 02, 2015

Alcohol consumption when pregnancy is unwanted or unintended

Jan. 12, 2015

Latest Data on Contraceptive Use in the United States

Dec. 01, 2014

LateBreaker sampler from Contraceptive Technology conference

Nov. 05, 2014

Emergency Contraceptive Pill Efficacy and BMI/Body Weight

Sep. 29, 2014

Handout on Unintended Pregnancy and Contraceptive Choice

Aug. 27, 2014

Ask About Withdrawal (Really!)

Jul. 31, 2014

Rules to Practice By: Safety First and Cleanliness is Close to. . .

Jul. 01, 2014

What’s Vanity Fair Got Against the NuvaRing?

Jun. 02, 2014

Promising New Treatment for Hepatitis C

May. 01, 2014

Numbers matter, so make them simple for patients

Apr. 01, 2014

The Recession’s Effect on Unintended Pregnancies

Mar. 05, 2014

Lessons Learned from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: The Hull LARC Initiative

Feb. 03, 2014

Applying the “New” Cervical Cytology Guidelines in Your Practice

Jan. 02, 2014

Acute Excessive Uterine Bleeding: New Management Strategies

Dec. 03, 2013

Medical indications for IUD use in teens

Oct. 09, 2013

Whatever happened to PID?

Oct. 05, 2013

Update on Emergency Contraception

Oct. 01, 2013

Contraceptivetechnology.com New and Improved